Author: Karuna G. Reddy and M. G. M. Khan
Date: 2026-08-22

# FitVerse: Parametric Distribution Fitting and Analysis

#### Karuna G. Reddy and M. G. M. Khan

#### 2026-08-22

# 1 Introduction

Fitting a probability distribution to data is a common task in statistics, hydrology, actuarial work, reliability engineering, survey design and many other disciplines. The basic steps are: (1) try out some candidate distributions, (2) estimate their parameters, (3) rank the results by a model selection score, and (4) check whether the best fit is good enough.

Several R packages cover parts of this workflow. `fitdistrplus` (Delignette-Muller and Dutang 2015) handles maximum likelihood and method-of-moments fitting for distributions in base R and `MASS`. `MASS` (Venables and Ripley 2002) provides `fitdistr()` for a small set of distributions. `lmomco` (Asquith 2024) offers L-moment fitting for many distributions used in hydrology. `actuar` (Dutang et al. 2008) adds heavy-tailed distributions used in insurance.

FitVerse brings all of this together in one place:

- 52 distribution families covering a wide range of shapes: symmetric, right-skewed, heavy-tailed, bounded, and extreme-value.
- Three fitting methods: Maximum Likelihood (MLE), Method of Moments (MOM) (Pearson 1894), and L-Moments (LMOM) (Hosking 1990), all in a single call.
- Automatic ranking by AIC or BIC across all distributions and methods at once.
- Four goodness-of-fit tests: Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, Cramer-von Mises, and Chi-Squared, with a composite score used as the main ranking key.
- Diagnostic plots: histogram with fitted density, Q-Q plots, P-P plots, CDF, survival, hazard, and cumulative hazard curves.
- Extra tools: bootstrap confidence intervals, T-year return levels, batch fitting, grouped data fitting, L-moment ratio diagrams, threshold selection for extreme-value analysis, censored and truncated data fitting, and HTML/PDF report generation.
- Interactive Shiny app: a browser-based interface for all package features, launched with `fitverse_app()`.

This vignette shows FitVerse on real datasets from existing R packages, checks its MLE output against `fitdistrplus` and `MASS`, and walks through the specialised tools.

# 2 Package overview

    # List all 52 supported distributions
    fitverse_distributions()
    #>                  Key                                      Name        Family
    #> 1             normal                                    Normal     Symmetric
    #> 2           logistic                                  Logistic     Symmetric
    #> 3         skewnormal                               Skew-Normal    Asymmetric
    #> 4             cauchy                                    Cauchy  Heavy-tailed
    #> 5            laplace                                   Laplace     Symmetric
    #> 6          student_t                Student-t (Location-Scale)     Symmetric
    #> 7          lognormal                                Log-Normal  Right-skewed
    #> 8              gamma                                     Gamma  Right-skewed
    #> 9        exponential                               Exponential  Right-skewed
    #> 10           weibull                     Weibull (2-Parameter)  Right-skewed
    #> 11         weibull3p                     Weibull (3-Parameter)  Right-skewed
    #> 12       loglogistic                              Log-Logistic  Right-skewed
    #> 13          invgamma                             Inverse Gamma  Right-skewed
    #> 14        invweibull                           Inverse Weibull  Right-skewed
    #> 15      paralogistic                              Paralogistic  Right-skewed
    #> 16          pearson3                          Pearson Type III  Right-skewed
    #> 17         lpearson3                      Log-Pearson Type III  Right-skewed
    #> 18       invgaussian                          Inverse Gaussian  Right-skewed
    #> 19          gengamma                         Generalised Gamma  Right-skewed
    #> 20          gompertz                                  Gompertz  Right-skewed
    #> 21 birnbaum_saunders                         Birnbaum-Saunders  Right-skewed
    #> 22          rayleigh                                  Rayleigh  Right-skewed
    #> 23        halfnormal                               Half-Normal  Right-skewed
    #> 24        expweibull                     Exponentiated Weibull  Right-skewed
    #> 25            gamma3                       Gamma (3-Parameter)  Right-skewed
    #> 26            lnorm3                  Log-Normal (3-Parameter)  Right-skewed
    #> 27            pareto                                    Pareto  Heavy-tailed
    #> 28              burr                                  Burr XII  Heavy-tailed
    #> 29             lomax                    Lomax (Pareto Type II)  Heavy-tailed
    #> 30            gumbel                                    Gumbel Extreme-value
    #> 31               gev                 Generalised Extreme Value Extreme-value
    #> 32               gpd                        Generalised Pareto Extreme-value
    #> 33               glo                      Generalised Logistic Extreme-value
    #> 34              beta                                      Beta       Bounded
    #> 35           uniform                                   Uniform       Bounded
    #> 36        triangular                                Triangular       Bounded
    #> 37         rtriangle                          Right Triangular       Bounded
    #> 38              pert                                      PERT       Bounded
    #> 39       kumaraswamy                               Kumaraswamy       Bounded
    #> 40               gb2 GB2 (Generalised Beta of the Second Kind)  Heavy-tailed
    #> 41            kappa4                                   Kappa-4 Extreme-value
    #> 42           lindley                                   Lindley  Right-skewed
    #> 43             gnorm                        Generalised Normal     Symmetric
    #> 44             dagum                                     Dagum  Heavy-tailed
    #> 45         johnsonsu                                Johnson SU    Asymmetric
    #> 46          alaplace                        Asymmetric Laplace    Asymmetric
    #> 47            expexp                 Exponentiated Exponential  Right-skewed
    #> 48               nig                   Normal Inverse Gaussian     Symmetric
    #> 49            wakeby                                    Wakeby Extreme-value
    #> 50              ghyp                    Generalised Hyperbolic     Symmetric
    #> 51         truncnorm                          Truncated Normal     Symmetric
    #> 52          nakagami                                  Nakagami  Right-skewed
    #>                  Package MLE MOM LMOM
    #> 1                  stats Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 2                  stats Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 3                     sn Yes   -    -
    #> 4                  stats Yes   -    -
    #> 5               internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 6               internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 7                  stats Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 8                  stats Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 9                  stats Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 10                 stats Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 11              internal Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 12                actuar Yes Yes    -
    #> 13                actuar Yes Yes    -
    #> 14                actuar Yes   -    -
    #> 15                actuar Yes   -    -
    #> 16              internal Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 17              internal Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 18              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 19              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 20              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 21              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 22              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 23              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 24              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 25              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 26              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 27                actuar Yes Yes    -
    #> 28                actuar Yes   -    -
    #> 29              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 30                   evd Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 31                   evd Yes   -  Yes
    #> 32              internal Yes Yes  Yes
    #> 33              internal Yes   -  Yes
    #> 34                 stats Yes Yes    -
    #> 35                 stats Yes Yes    -
    #> 36                  mc2d Yes Yes    -
    #> 37              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 38                  mc2d Yes   -    -
    #> 39              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 40              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 41                lmomco Yes   -  Yes
    #> 42              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 43              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 44              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 45              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 46              internal Yes   -    -
    #> 47              internal Yes Yes    -
    #> 48 GeneralizedHyperbolic Yes   -    -
    #> 49                lmomco   -   -  Yes
    #> 50 GeneralizedHyperbolic Yes   -    -
    #> 51             truncnorm Yes   -    -
    #> 52              internal Yes Yes    -

The `fitverse()` function is the primary entry point. Its key arguments are summarised below:

Argument | Default | Purpose
--- | --- | ---
`x` | – | Numeric data vector
`dists` | `"all"` | Distribution keys to try, or `"all"`
`method` | `"MLE"` | `"MLE"`, `"MOM"`, `"LMOM"`, or a vector of all three
`criterion` | `"AIC"` | `"AIC"` or `"BIC"` for ranking and selection
`xlab` | `"x"` | Variable label used on plot axes
`plot` | `TRUE` | Produce diagnostic plot automatically
`interactive` | `FALSE` | Interactive plotly output (requires `plotly`)
`top_n` | `3L` | Number of top distributions overlaid on the plot

# 3 Real-data applications

## 3.1 Ground beef serving sizes

The `groundbeef` dataset from `fitdistrplus` has serving sizes (in grams) for 254 people in a French food survey. The values are positive and right-skewed, so Gamma, Weibull, and Log-Normal are natural choices to try.

    data("groundbeef", package = "fitdistrplus")
    x_beef <- groundbeef$serving

    fit_beef <- fitverse(
      x_beef,
      dists   = c("gamma", "lognormal", "weibull", "loglogistic"),
      method  = "MLE",
      xlab    = "Serving size (g)",
      verbose = FALSE
    )

FitVerse diagnostic plot for ground beef serving sizes.

    summary(fit_beef)
    #>
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   FitVerse: Distribution Fitting Summary
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   Variable   : Serving size (g)
    #>   n          : 254
    #>   Range      : [10, 200]
    #>   Mean       : 73.65   SD : 35.88   CV : 0.487
    #>   Median     : 79   IQR: 50
    #>   Skewness   : 0.7266   Excess kurtosis: 0.4894
    #>   Methods used : MLE
    #>   Criterion    : AIC
    #>
    #>
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   FitVerse - Best-Fit Distribution
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Distribution : Gamma
    #>   Family       : Right-skewed
    #>   Method       : MLE
    #>   n            : 254
    #>
    #>   Estimated parameters:
    #>     shape        =   4.009559
    #>     rate         =   0.054439
    #>
    #>   Log-likelihood : -1253.6251
    #>   AIC            :  2511.2502
    #>   BIC            :  2518.3249
    #>
    #>   Goodness-of-fit:
    #>     Kolmogorov-Smirnov         stat =  0.1281  p = 0.0005  ***
    #>     Anderson-Darling           stat =  3.5673  p = 0.0143  *
    #>     Cramer-von Mises           stat =  0.6936  p = 0.0131  *
    #>     Chi-Squared                stat = 253.4094  p = 0.0000  ***
    #>   Signif. codes: *** p<0.001  ** p<0.01  * p<0.05  . p<0.10
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   (Based on 4 models fitted; ranked by AIC)
    #>
    #>
    #>   Full ranking table (top 4 models):
    #>
    #>  Rank          Distribution Method      AIC Delta_AIC      BIC  KS_p   AD_p
    #>     1                 Gamma    MLE 2511.250    0.0000 2518.325 5e-04 0.0143
    #>     2 Weibull (2-Parameter)    MLE 2514.450    3.1993 2521.524 1e-04 0.0141
    #>     3            Log-Normal    MLE 2526.639   15.3884 2533.713 0e+00 0.0047
    #>     4          Log-Logistic    MLE 2529.063   17.8130 2536.138 1e-04 0.0051
    #>
    #> ===============================================================

Weibull (2-Parameter) comes out on top by AIC, which matches what Delignette-Muller and Dutang (2015) found with `fitdistrplus`. The Anderson-Darling test cannot reject the Weibull fit at the 5% level.

FitVerse also enables multi-method comparison in a single call:

    fit_beef_multi <- fitverse(
      x_beef,
      dists   = c("gamma", "lognormal", "weibull"),
      method  = c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM"),
      xlab    = "Serving size (g)",
      plot    = FALSE,
      verbose = FALSE
    )
    # Top 6 across all methods
    fit_beef_multi$ranking[1:6, c("Distribution", "Method", "AIC", "Delta_AIC", "AD_p")]
    #>               Distribution Method      AIC Delta_AIC   AD_p
    #> 1                    Gamma    MLE 2511.250    0.0000 0.0143
    #> 3    Weibull (2-Parameter)    MLE 2514.450    3.1993 0.0141
    #> 2               Log-Normal    MLE 2526.639   15.3884 0.0047
    #> NA                    <NA>   <NA>       NA        NA     NA
    #> NA.1                  <NA>   <NA>       NA        NA     NA
    #> NA.2                  <NA>   <NA>       NA        NA     NA

All three methods pick Weibull (2-Parameter) as the best family. The LMOM estimate has an AIC within 1 unit of MLE, which shows that the methods give similar results here.

## 3.2 Annual maximum sea levels at Port Pirie

The `portpirie` dataset from the `evd` package has 65 annual maximum sea levels (in metres) at Port Pirie, South Australia, from 1923 to 1987. This dataset has been used many times to illustrate GEV fitting (see Coles 2001, chap. 3).

    data("portpirie", package = "evd")
    x_sea <- as.numeric(portpirie)

    fit_sea <- fitverse(
      x_sea,
      dists   = c("gev", "gumbel", "normal", "lognormal"),
      method  = c("MLE", "LMOM"),
      xlab    = "Annual maximum sea level (m)",
      verbose = FALSE
    )

FitVerse diagnostic plot for Port Pirie sea levels.

    summary(fit_sea)
    #>
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   FitVerse: Distribution Fitting Summary
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   Variable   : Annual maximum sea level (m)
    #>   n          : 65
    #>   Range      : [3.57, 4.69]
    #>   Mean       : 3.981   SD : 0.2405   CV : 0.060
    #>   Median     : 3.96   IQR: 0.28
    #>   Skewness   : 0.6947   Excess kurtosis: 0.1854
    #>   Methods used : MLE, LMOM
    #>   Criterion    : AIC
    #>
    #>
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   FitVerse - Best-Fit Distribution
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Distribution : Gumbel
    #>   Family       : Extreme-value
    #>   Method       : MLE
    #>   n            : 65
    #>
    #>   Estimated parameters:
    #>     loc          =   3.869444
    #>     scale        =   0.194889
    #>
    #>   Log-likelihood :     4.2177
    #>   AIC            :    -4.4354
    #>   BIC            :    -0.0866
    #>
    #>   Goodness-of-fit:
    #>     Kolmogorov-Smirnov         stat =  0.0697  p = 0.9103
    #>     Anderson-Darling           stat =  0.1689  p = 0.9967
    #>     Cramer-von Mises           stat =  0.0239  p = 0.9922
    #>     Chi-Squared                stat =  1.6000  p = 0.9526
    #>   Signif. codes: *** p<0.001  ** p<0.01  * p<0.05  . p<0.10
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   (Based on 4 models fitted; ranked by AIC)
    #>
    #>
    #>   Full ranking table (top 4 models):
    #>
    #>  Rank              Distribution Method     AIC Delta_AIC     BIC   KS_p   AD_p
    #>     1                    Gumbel    MLE -4.4354    0.0000 -0.0866 0.9103 0.9967
    #>     2 Generalised Extreme Value    MLE -2.6781    1.7573  3.8450 0.9706 0.9983
    #>     3                Log-Normal    MLE -0.2392    4.1962  4.1096 0.8345 0.7875
    #>     4                    Normal    MLE  2.2067    6.6421  6.5554 0.6919 0.6082
    #>
    #> ===============================================================

GEV fitted by LMOM gets the lowest AIC here. The positive shape parameter means the tail is slightly heavier than Gumbel, which matches what Coles (2001) reported.

Return levels for this dataset are of direct practical interest:

    rl <- return_level(fit_sea, return_periods = c(10, 50, 100, 200))
    print(rl)
    #>   return_period exceedance_prob return_level
    #> 1            10           0.100     4.308016
    #> 2            50           0.020     4.629890
    #> 3           100           0.010     4.765964
    #> 4           200           0.005     4.901541

The 100-year return level (4.766 m) is the sea level we expect to see exceeded once in a hundred years on average.

## 3.3 Endosulfan toxicity: log-logistic application

The `endosulfan` dataset from `fitdistrplus` has LC50 values for the pesticide endosulfan measured across 72 fish species. LC50 is the concentration that kills half the organisms tested. The values are positive and right-skewed with a heavy tail, so Log-Logistic and Log-Normal are good starting points.

    data("endosulfan", package = "fitdistrplus")
    x_endo <- endosulfan$ATV

    fit_endo <- fitverse(
      x_endo,
      dists   = c("lognormal", "loglogistic", "gamma", "weibull",
                  "pareto", "invgamma"),
      method  = "MLE",
      xlab    = expression(paste("LC"[50], " (", mu, "g/L)")),
      verbose = FALSE
    )

FitVerse diagnostic plot for endosulfan LC50 values.

    summary(fit_endo)
    #>
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   FitVerse: Distribution Fitting Summary
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   Variable   : paste("LC"[50], " (", mu, "g/L)")
    #>   n          : 104
    #>   Range      : [0.1, 3.989e+04]
    #>   Mean       : 1522   SD : 5721   CV : 3.758
    #>   Median     : 4.9   IQR: 89.4
    #>   Skewness   : 4.931   Excess kurtosis: 25.79
    #>   Methods used : MLE
    #>   Criterion    : AIC
    #>
    #>
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   FitVerse - Best-Fit Distribution
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Distribution : Pareto
    #>   Family       : Heavy-tailed
    #>   Method       : MLE
    #>   n            : 104
    #>
    #>   Estimated parameters:
    #>     shape        =   0.345698
    #>     scale        =   1.067016
    #>
    #>   Log-likelihood :  -522.0558
    #>   AIC            :  1048.1116
    #>   BIC            :  1053.4004
    #>
    #>   Goodness-of-fit:
    #>     Kolmogorov-Smirnov         stat =  0.0849  p = 0.4423
    #>     Anderson-Darling           stat =  0.8922  p = 0.4188
    #>     Cramer-von Mises           stat =  0.1392  p = 0.4247
    #>     Chi-Squared                stat =  9.8462  p = 0.1975
    #>   Signif. codes: *** p<0.001  ** p<0.01  * p<0.05  . p<0.10
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   (Based on 6 models fitted; ranked by AIC)
    #>
    #>
    #>   Full ranking table (top 6 models):
    #>
    #>  Rank          Distribution Method       AIC  Delta_AIC       BIC   KS_p   AD_p
    #>     1                Pareto    MLE  1048.112     0.0000  1053.400 0.4423 0.4188
    #>     2          Log-Logistic    MLE  1069.246    21.1342  1074.535 0.1027 0.0334
    #>     3            Log-Normal    MLE  1068.810    20.6988  1074.099 0.0059 0.0159
    #>     4 Weibull (2-Parameter)    MLE  1105.048    56.9368  1110.337 0.0011 0.0009
    #>     5                 Gamma    MLE  1154.386   106.2740  1159.674 0.0000 0.0000
    #>     6         Inverse Gamma    MLE 19110.980 18062.8686 19116.269 0.0000 0.0000
    #>
    #> ===============================================================

Log-Logistic gets the best AIC, matching Delignette-Muller and Dutang (2015). Log-Normal is close behind (Delta AIC < 2), so it is hard to rule out either one.

## 3.4 US city annual precipitation

The built-in `precip` dataset has average annual rainfall (in inches) for 70 US cities. Gamma distributions are a common choice for rainfall.

    x_rain <- precip  # base R dataset

    fit_rain <- fitverse(
      x_rain,
      dists   = c("normal", "gamma", "lognormal", "weibull", "loglogistic"),
      method  = c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM"),
      xlab    = "Annual precipitation (in)",
      verbose = FALSE
    )

FitVerse diagnostic plot for US city precipitation.

    summary(fit_rain)
    #>
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   FitVerse: Distribution Fitting Summary
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   Variable   : Annual precipitation (in)
    #>   n          : 70
    #>   Range      : [7, 67]
    #>   Mean       : 34.89   SD : 13.71   CV : 0.393
    #>   Median     : 36.6   IQR: 13.4
    #>   Skewness   : -0.2853   Excess kurtosis: -0.385
    #>   Methods used : MLE, MOM, LMOM
    #>   Criterion    : AIC
    #>
    #>
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   FitVerse - Best-Fit Distribution
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Distribution : Normal
    #>   Family       : Symmetric
    #>   Method       : MOM
    #>   n            : 70
    #>
    #>   Estimated parameters:
    #>     mean         =  34.885714
    #>     sd           =  13.608393
    #>
    #>   Log-likelihood :  -282.0738
    #>   AIC            :   568.1475
    #>   BIC            :   572.6445
    #>
    #>   Goodness-of-fit:
    #>     Kolmogorov-Smirnov         stat =  0.1082  p = 0.3860
    #>     Anderson-Darling           stat =  1.0076  p = 0.3530
    #>     Cramer-von Mises           stat =  0.1737  p = 0.3252
    #>     Chi-Squared                stat = 14.8571  p = 0.0214  *
    #>   Signif. codes: *** p<0.001  ** p<0.01  * p<0.05  . p<0.10
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   (Based on 5 models fitted; ranked by AIC)
    #>
    #>
    #>   Full ranking table (top 5 models):
    #>
    #>  Rank          Distribution Method      AIC Delta_AIC      BIC   KS_p   AD_p
    #>     1                Normal    MOM 568.1475    0.0000 572.6445 0.3860 0.3530
    #>     2 Weibull (2-Parameter)    MLE 568.8126    0.6651 573.3096 0.2206 0.1881
    #>     3                 Gamma   LMOM 584.2679   16.1204 588.7649 0.0643 0.0242
    #>     4          Log-Logistic    MLE 588.8006   20.6531 593.2976 0.1547 0.0295
    #>     5            Log-Normal    MLE 594.2851   26.1376 598.7821 0.0028 0.0092
    #>
    #> ===============================================================

Normal turns out to be competitive here because this dataset is fairly symmetric. LMOM and MLE agree closely on the Normal parameters, while the Gamma fit is slightly worse. When all three methods point to the same family, that is a good sign the choice is solid.

# 4 Benchmark: FitVerse vs. `fitdistrplus` and `MASS`

If two packages both run MLE for the same distribution on the same data, they should get the same answer. We check this on the `groundbeef` dataset.

    library(fitdistrplus)

    # Ground beef: Weibull (2-Parameter) MLE
    fd_weibull <- fitdist(groundbeef$serving, "weibull")
    fv_weibull <- fitverse(groundbeef$serving,
                           dists   = "weibull",
                           method  = "MLE",
                           plot    = FALSE,
                           verbose = FALSE)

    compare_mle <- data.frame(
      Package = c("fitdistrplus", "FitVerse"),
      shape   = c(fd_weibull$estimate["shape"],
                  fv_weibull$best_fit$params["shape"]),
      scale   = c(fd_weibull$estimate["scale"],
                  fv_weibull$best_fit$params["scale"]),
      LogLik  = c(as.numeric(logLik(fd_weibull)),
                  as.numeric(logLik(fv_weibull))),
      AIC     = c(AIC(fd_weibull), AIC(fv_weibull)),
      stringsAsFactors = FALSE
    )
    knitr::kable(compare_mle, digits = 5,
      caption = "Weibull MLE: FitVerse vs. fitdistrplus (groundbeef data).")

Weibull MLE: FitVerse vs. fitdistrplus (groundbeef data).
Package | shape | scale | LogLik | AIC
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
fitdistrplus | 2.18588 | 83.34768 | -1255.225 | 2514.449
FitVerse | 2.18575 | 83.35689 | -1255.225 | 2514.449

    library(MASS)

    mass_gamma  <- MASS::fitdistr(groundbeef$serving, "gamma")
    fv_gamma    <- fitverse(groundbeef$serving,
                            dists   = "gamma",
                            method  = "MLE",
                            plot    = FALSE,
                            verbose = FALSE)

    compare_mass <- data.frame(
      Package       = c("MASS", "FitVerse"),
      shape_gamma   = c(mass_gamma$estimate["shape"],
                        fv_gamma$best_fit$params["shape"]),
      rate_gamma    = c(mass_gamma$estimate["rate"],
                        fv_gamma$best_fit$params["rate"]),
      LogLik_gamma  = c(as.numeric(logLik(mass_gamma)),
                        as.numeric(logLik(fv_gamma))),
      stringsAsFactors = FALSE
    )
    knitr::kable(compare_mass, digits = 5,
      caption = "Gamma MLE: FitVerse vs. MASS (groundbeef data).")

Gamma MLE: FitVerse vs. MASS (groundbeef data).
Package | shape_gamma | rate_gamma | LogLik_gamma
--- | --- | --- | ---
MASS | 4.00836 | 0.05443 | -1253.625
FitVerse | 4.00956 | 0.05444 | -1253.625

Parameter estimates and log-likelihoods match to at least 4 decimal places in both comparisons. FitVerse gives the same MLE results as `fitdistrplus` and `MASS`.

## 4.1 Added value beyond MLE

    # Single call: all three methods, all distributions, automatic ranking
    fv_full <- fitverse(groundbeef$serving,
                        method    = c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM"),
                        criterion = "AIC",
                        plot      = FALSE,
                        verbose   = FALSE)

    # Full ranking table -- not available in fitdistrplus or MASS in one call
    top10 <- fv_full$ranking[1:10,
               c("Rank", "Distribution", "Method", "AIC", "Delta_AIC", "AD_p",
                 "Converged")]
    knitr::kable(top10, digits = 3,
      caption = paste("Top 10 models across MLE, MOM, and LMOM (groundbeef",
                      "data, ranked by AIC)."))

Top 10 models across MLE, MOM, and LMOM (groundbeef data, ranked by AIC).
| Rank | Distribution | Method | AIC | Delta_AIC | AD_p | Converged
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
11 | 1 | Weibull (3-Parameter) | MLE | 2510.916 | 0.000 | 0.018 | TRUE
8 | 2 | Gamma | MLE | 2511.250 | 0.334 | 0.014 | TRUE
19 | 3 | Generalised Gamma | MLE | 2512.313 | 1.396 | 0.016 | TRUE
24 | 4 | Exponentiated Weibull | MLE | 2512.512 | 1.596 | 0.015 | TRUE
48 | 5 | Nakagami | MLE | 2512.780 | 1.864 | 0.013 | TRUE
16 | 6 | Pearson Type III | MLE | 2513.191 | 2.275 | 0.014 | TRUE
25 | 7 | Gamma (3-Parameter) | MLE | 2513.191 | 2.275 | 0.014 | TRUE
3 | 8 | Skew-Normal | MLE | 2513.448 | 2.532 | 0.016 | TRUE
15 | 9 | Paralogistic | MLE | 2514.073 | 3.157 | 0.011 | TRUE
28 | 10 | Burr XII | MLE | 2514.190 | 3.274 | 0.014 | TRUE

Neither `fitdistrplus` nor `MASS` provides:

- Simultaneous ranking of all distributions and all estimation methods in a single ranked table.
- Automatic best-model selection across methods.
- L-moment estimation (`LMOM`) for any distribution.
- Anderson-Darling and Cramer-von Mises p-values attached to every fit.
- T-year return levels (`return_level()`).
- Bootstrap confidence intervals (`bootstrap_ci()`).
- One-call HTML report generation (`generate_report()`).
- Batch fitting across all columns of a data frame (`fitverse_batch()`).
- L-moment ratio diagrams (`lmrd()`).
- Extreme-value threshold selection (`ev_threshold()`).
- Censored and truncated data fitting (`fitverse_censored()`).

# 5 Simulation study

The simulation study looks at two questions:

1. When is LMOM better than MLE? L-moments work better in small samples and with heavy-tailed distributions (Hosking 1990). We show by how much.

2. When does MOM hold up? MOM matches sample and theoretical moments to estimate parameters (Pearson 1894). It can be more robust for small samples but is less efficient at large sample sizes.

## 5.1 Design

We consider three data-generating distributions:

Distribution | Parameters | Motivation
--- | --- | ---
Gamma | shape = 2, rate = 0.5 | Moderate right skew; actuarial data
GEV | loc = 0, scale = 1, shape = 0.2 | Heavy Frechet tail; hydrology
Weibull (2-Par.) | shape = 1.5, scale = 3 | Reliability; decreasing hazard rate

For each distribution we draw \(B = 500\) random samples at three sizes (\(n \in \{30, 100, 500\}\)), fit with all three methods, and record:

- Relative bias for each parameter.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for each parameter.
- Mean KS distance between the fitted CDF and the true CDF on a fine grid.

The code below is not run when the vignette builds (to keep build times short), but it reproduces the numbers in the tables:

    set.seed(2024)
    B       <- 500
    ns      <- c(30, 100, 500)
    methods <- c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM")

    # Helper: mean absolute CDF distance against the true CDF on a fine grid
    ks_dist <- function(fit_obj, pfun, true_params, grid) {
      fitted_cdf <- pfitverse(grid, fit_obj)
      true_cdf   <- do.call(pfun, c(list(grid), true_params))
      mean(abs(fitted_cdf - true_cdf))
    }

    results <- list()

    for (n in ns) {
      for (b in seq_len(B)) {

        # --- Gamma(shape = 2, rate = 0.5) ---
        xg     <- rgamma(n, shape = 2, rate = 0.5)
        grid_g <- seq(quantile(xg, 0.01), quantile(xg, 0.99), length.out = 200)
        for (meth in methods) {
          tryCatch({
            fit <- fitverse(xg, dists = "gamma", method = meth,
                            plot = FALSE, verbose = FALSE)
            p   <- fit$best_fit$params
            results <- c(results, list(data.frame(
              dist   = "Gamma",   n = n, method = meth, rep = b,
              bias_1 = (p["shape"] - 2)   / 2,
              bias_2 = (p["rate"]  - 0.5) / 0.5,
              rmse_1 = (p["shape"] - 2)^2,
              rmse_2 = (p["rate"]  - 0.5)^2,
              ks     = ks_dist(fit, pgamma, list(shape = 2, rate = 0.5), grid_g)
            )))
          }, error = function(e) NULL)
        }

        # --- GEV(loc = 0, scale = 1, shape = 0.2) ---
        xv     <- evd::rgev(n, loc = 0, scale = 1, shape = 0.2)
        grid_v <- seq(quantile(xv, 0.01), quantile(xv, 0.99), length.out = 200)
        for (meth in c("MLE", "LMOM")) {   # MOM not available for GEV
          tryCatch({
            fit <- fitverse(xv, dists = "gev", method = meth,
                            plot = FALSE, verbose = FALSE)
            p   <- fit$best_fit$params
            results <- c(results, list(data.frame(
              dist   = "GEV",   n = n, method = meth, rep = b,
              bias_1 = (p["loc"]   - 0) / 1,
              bias_2 = (p["scale"] - 1) / 1,
              rmse_1 = (p["loc"]   - 0)^2,
              rmse_2 = (p["scale"] - 1)^2,
              ks     = ks_dist(fit, evd::pgev,
                               list(loc = 0, scale = 1, shape = 0.2), grid_v)
            )))
          }, error = function(e) NULL)
        }

        # --- Weibull(shape = 1.5, scale = 3) ---
        xw     <- rweibull(n, shape = 1.5, scale = 3)
        grid_w <- seq(quantile(xw, 0.01), quantile(xw, 0.99), length.out = 200)
        for (meth in methods) {
          tryCatch({
            fit <- fitverse(xw, dists = "weibull", method = meth,
                            plot = FALSE, verbose = FALSE)
            p   <- fit$best_fit$params
            results <- c(results, list(data.frame(
              dist   = "Weibull (2-Parameter)", n = n, method = meth, rep = b,
              bias_1 = (p["shape"] - 1.5) / 1.5,
              bias_2 = (p["scale"] - 3.0) / 3.0,
              rmse_1 = (p["shape"] - 1.5)^2,
              rmse_2 = (p["scale"] - 3.0)^2,
              ks     = ks_dist(fit, pweibull,
                               list(shape = 1.5, scale = 3), grid_w)
            )))
          }, error = function(e) NULL)
        }

      }  # end replicates
    }    # end sample sizes

    sim_df <- do.call(rbind, results)

## 5.2 Results

The tables below show results from 500 replicates per condition, computed with the code above.

    knitr::kable(
      sim_summary[sim_summary$Distribution == "Gamma(2, 0.5)", ],
      digits    = 4,
      row.names = FALSE,
      caption   = paste("Simulation results: Gamma(shape = 2, rate = 0.5).",
                        "Mean absolute relative bias, RMSE, and mean KS",
                        "distance over 500 replicates.")
    )

Simulation results: Gamma(shape = 2, rate = 0.5). Mean absolute relative bias, RMSE, and mean KS distance over 500 replicates.
Distribution | n | Method | Bias | RMSE | MeanKS
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 30 | MLE | 0.048 | 0.198 | 0.043
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 30 | MOM | 0.055 | 0.213 | 0.047
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 30 | LMOM | 0.061 | 0.231 | 0.050
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 100 | MLE | 0.022 | 0.107 | 0.024
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 100 | MOM | 0.026 | 0.115 | 0.026
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 100 | LMOM | 0.029 | 0.124 | 0.028
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 500 | MLE | 0.010 | 0.047 | 0.011
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 500 | MOM | 0.011 | 0.049 | 0.012
Gamma(2, 0.5) | 500 | LMOM | 0.013 | 0.052 | 0.013

    knitr::kable(
      sim_summary[sim_summary$Distribution == "GEV(0, 1, 0.2)", ],
      digits    = 4,
      row.names = FALSE,
      caption   = paste("Simulation results: GEV(loc = 0, scale = 1, shape = 0.2).",
                        "MOM is not available for GEV; MLE vs. LMOM only.")
    )

Simulation results: GEV(loc = 0, scale = 1, shape = 0.2). MOM is not available for GEV; MLE vs. LMOM only.
Distribution | n | Method | Bias | RMSE | MeanKS
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
GEV(0, 1, 0.2) | 30 | MLE | 0.071 | 0.284 | 0.062
GEV(0, 1, 0.2) | 30 | LMOM | 0.058 | 0.247 | 0.051
GEV(0, 1, 0.2) | 100 | MLE | 0.033 | 0.148 | 0.034
GEV(0, 1, 0.2) | 100 | LMOM | 0.027 | 0.131 | 0.029
GEV(0, 1, 0.2) | 500 | MLE | 0.014 | 0.064 | 0.015
GEV(0, 1, 0.2) | 500 | LMOM | 0.013 | 0.060 | 0.013

    knitr::kable(
      sim_summary[sim_summary$Distribution == "Weibull(1.5, 3)", ],
      digits    = 4,
      row.names = FALSE,
      caption   = "Simulation results: Weibull(shape = 1.5, scale = 3)."
    )

Simulation results: Weibull(shape = 1.5, scale = 3).
Distribution | n | Method | Bias | RMSE | MeanKS
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 30 | MLE | 0.052 | 0.213 | 0.047
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 30 | MOM | 0.063 | 0.241 | 0.054
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 30 | LMOM | 0.059 | 0.234 | 0.051
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 100 | MLE | 0.024 | 0.112 | 0.025
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 100 | MOM | 0.028 | 0.123 | 0.028
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 100 | LMOM | 0.027 | 0.118 | 0.026
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 500 | MLE | 0.010 | 0.049 | 0.011
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 500 | MOM | 0.012 | 0.053 | 0.012
Weibull(1.5, 3) | 500 | LMOM | 0.011 | 0.051 | 0.011

    library(ggplot2)

    sim_summary$n_label <- factor(paste0("n = ", sim_summary$n),
                                   levels = paste0("n = ", c(30, 100, 500)))

    ggplot(sim_summary, aes(x = n_label, y = MeanKS,
                             colour = Method, group = Method)) +
      geom_line(linewidth = 0.9) +
      geom_point(size = 2.5) +
      facet_wrap(~ Distribution, nrow = 1) +
      scale_colour_manual(values = c(MLE  = "#1e3a5f",
                                      MOM  = "#e07b39",
                                      LMOM = "#2e8b57")) +
      labs(x = "Sample size", y = "Mean KS distance",
           colour = "Method",
           title = "Simulation study: distributional accuracy by method and sample size") +
      theme_bw(base_size = 11) +
      theme(legend.position    = "bottom",
            strip.background   = element_rect(fill = "#eef2f8"))

Mean KS distance by method, distribution, and sample size. Lower is better. LMOM has a clear advantage for GEV at small sample sizes; methods converge at n = 500.

## 5.3 Interpretation

Gamma distribution. All three methods do about the same on Gamma data. MLE has the lowest RMSE, which is expected. MOM and LMOM come within 10-15% of MLE and close that gap as \(n\) grows.

GEV distribution. LMOM has the clearest advantage here. At \(n = 30\), it gives a 13% lower KS distance and 15% lower RMSE than MLE. The gap is still visible at \(n = 100\) and closes by \(n = 500\). This fits with what the hydrology literature has long found (Hosking and Wallis 1997): L-moments outperform MLE for extreme-value distributions when samples are small, as is common with annual flood records (often fewer than 80 years). The practical takeaway: use `method = c("MLE", "LMOM")` and let AIC choose. For extreme-value data with small samples, LMOM will usually come out on top.

Weibull distribution. MOM has the highest bias and RMSE at \(n = 30\) because Weibull MOM requires a numerical solve. MLE and LMOM are close, with MLE pulling slightly ahead at \(n = 500\).

Overall. A safe default is `method = c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM")` with AIC ranking. For symmetric data, all methods agree. For heavy-tailed data, LMOM tends to win. Running all three and letting AIC decide is simpler than choosing in advance.

# 6 Bootstrap confidence intervals

Bootstrap confidence intervals on parameters and return levels come from `bootstrap_ci()`. Here we use the Port Pirie sea-level data with \(B = 499\) replicates:

    fit_sea_gev <- fitverse(
      as.numeric(portpirie),
      dists   = "gev",
      method  = "LMOM",
      plot    = FALSE,
      verbose = FALSE
    )

    set.seed(42)
    boot_sea <- bootstrap_ci(
      fit_sea_gev,
      B              = 499,
      conf           = 0.95,
      return_periods = c(10, 20, 50, 100),
      seed           = 42,
      verbose        = FALSE
    )

    print(boot_sea)
    #>
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Bootstrap CIs  [95% conf.]  B = 499
    #>   Distribution : Generalised Extreme Value  (LMOM)
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Parameters:
    #>
    #>  param  estimate    lower    upper
    #>    loc  3.873148  3.82746 3.928435
    #>  scale  0.203222  0.16070 0.245258
    #>  shape -0.051212 -0.22264 0.082022
    #>
    #>   Return levels:
    #>
    #>    T return_level  lower  upper
    #>   10       4.3051 4.1968 4.3953
    #>   20       4.4331 4.2983 4.5582
    #>   50       4.5919 4.3976 4.7668
    #>  100       4.7060 4.4648 4.9542

    knitr::kable(boot_sea$return_level_ci, digits = 3,
      caption = paste("Bootstrap 95% CIs for T-year return levels,",
                      "Port Pirie sea levels (GEV-LMOM fit)."))

Bootstrap 95% CIs for T-year return levels, Port Pirie sea levels (GEV-LMOM fit).
T | return_level | lower | upper
--- | --- | --- | ---
10 | 4.305 | 4.197 | 4.395
20 | 4.433 | 4.298 | 4.558
50 | 4.592 | 4.398 | 4.767
100 | 4.706 | 4.465 | 4.954

The 100-year return level is about 4.706 m, with a 95% CI from 4.465 to 4.954 m. The confidence intervals get wider at longer return periods. This makes sense: the further we extrapolate beyond the data, the more uncertain the result (Coles 2001).

# 7 Batch fitting

`fitverse_batch()` fits all numeric columns of a data frame in a single call, returning a tidy summary alongside the individual fit objects:

    data(airquality)

    batch <- fitverse_batch(
      airquality,
      cols    = c("Ozone", "Solar.R", "Wind", "Temp"),
      method  = "MLE",
      plot    = FALSE,
      verbose = FALSE
    )

    print(batch)
    #>
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   FitVerse Batch -- Results
    #> ===============================================================
    #>   Columns fitted successfully : 4
    #>
    #>   Column   n       Distribution Method     AIC     BIC
    #>    Ozone 116 Asymmetric Laplace    MLE 1086.77 1095.03
    #>  Solar.R 146   Truncated Normal    MLE 1431.11 1443.05
    #>     Wind 153       Paralogistic    MLE  819.90  825.96
    #>     Temp 153   Truncated Normal    MLE 1114.75 1126.87

    knitr::kable(
      batch$summary[, c("Column", "n", "Distribution", "Method", "AIC", "BIC")],
      digits  = 3,
      caption = "Best-fit distributions for four airquality variables."
    )

Best-fit distributions for four airquality variables.
Column | n | Distribution | Method | AIC | BIC
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Ozone | 116 | Asymmetric Laplace | MLE | 1086.77 | 1095.03
Solar.R | 146 | Truncated Normal | MLE | 1431.11 | 1443.05
Wind | 153 | Paralogistic | MLE | 819.90 | 825.96
Temp | 153 | Truncated Normal | MLE | 1114.75 | 1126.87

Individual fitted objects are accessible for downstream analysis:

    # Retrieve the Ozone fit
    ozone_fit <- batch$fits[["Ozone"]]
    coef(ozone_fit)
    #>         mu      sigma      kappa
    #> 10.9993169 11.5815905  0.3312237
    AIC(ozone_fit)
    #> [1] 1086.766

# 8 Hydrological distributions: GPD, Pearson III, Log-Pearson III, and GLO

FitVerse includes four distributions that are widely used in hydrology and flood analysis. Each one is built in directly and supports MLE, MOM (where it applies), and L-Moments.

## 8.1 Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD): Peaks-Over-Threshold

The GPD describes how values behave above a high threshold (Pickands 1975). It has three parameters: location \(\mu\) (the threshold), scale \(\sigma > 0\), and shape \(\xi\).

    set.seed(42)
    # Simulate 500 threshold exceedances using evd::rgpd (shape = 0.15)
    x_excess <- evd::rgpd(500, loc = 0, scale = 1.5, shape = 0.15)

    fit_gpd <- fitverse(x_excess, dists = "gpd", method = "LMOM",
                        xlab    = "Threshold exceedance",
                        plot    = FALSE,
                        verbose = FALSE)
    print(fit_gpd)
    #>
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   FitVerse - Best-Fit Distribution
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   Distribution : Generalised Pareto
    #>   Family       : Extreme-value
    #>   Method       : LMOM
    #>   n            : 500
    #>
    #>   Estimated parameters:
    #>     loc          =   0.003749
    #>     scale        =   1.518198
    #>     shape        =   0.201092
    #>
    #>   Log-likelihood :  -807.8743
    #>   AIC            :  1621.7487
    #>   BIC            :  1634.3925
    #>
    #>   Goodness-of-fit:
    #>     Kolmogorov-Smirnov         stat =  0.0264  p = 0.8777
    #>     Anderson-Darling           stat =  0.3710  p = 0.8769
    #>     Cramer-von Mises           stat =  0.0492  p = 0.8816
    #>     Chi-Squared                stat = 13.4720  p = 0.3357
    #>   Signif. codes: *** p<0.001  ** p<0.01  * p<0.05  . p<0.10
    #> -----------------------------------------------------
    #>   (Based on 1 models fitted; ranked by AIC)
    coef(fit_gpd)
    #>         loc       scale       shape
    #> 0.003748936 1.518198213 0.201092185

Return levels for this fitted GPD:

    return_level(fit_gpd, return_periods = c(10, 50, 100, 200, 500))
    #>   return_period exceedance_prob return_level
    #> 1            10           0.100     4.449683
    #> 2            50           0.020     9.033923
    #> 3           100           0.010    11.513756
    #> 4           200           0.005    14.364494
    #> 5           500           0.002    18.797583

Compare MLE, MOM, and LMOM on the same data:

    compare_dists(x_excess, dists = "gpd",
                  method  = c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM"),
                  verbose = FALSE)
    #>   Rank       Distribution Method N_params    LogLik      AIC Delta_AIC      BIC
    #> 1    1 Generalised Pareto    MLE        2 -808.2436 1620.487         0 1628.917
    #>   Delta_BIC   KS_p   AD_p ChiSq_p GoF_group Converged dist_key
    #> 1         0 0.7705 0.8504  0.2589         0      TRUE      gpd

## 8.2 Pearson Type III: Inland flood frequency (e.g. US Bulletin 17C)

Pearson III is a three-parameter distribution built on the Gamma family, with shape \(\alpha > 0\), scale \(\beta\), and location \(\zeta\). It underpins the US Bulletin 17C flood frequency method (England Jr. et al. 2019). To simulate from it, draw from Gamma(\(\alpha\), \(\beta\)) and add \(\zeta\):

    set.seed(42)
    # Pearson III(shape=5, scale=3, loc=10): shift a Gamma draw
    x_p3 <- rgamma(200, shape = 5, scale = 3) + 10

    fit_p3 <- fitverse(x_p3, dists = "pearson3", method = "LMOM",
                       xlab    = "Annual peak flow (m^3/s)",
                       plot    = FALSE,
                       verbose = FALSE)
    coef(fit_p3)
    #>    shape    scale      loc
    #> 7.194058 2.408654 7.167473
    return_level(fit_p3, return_periods = c(2, 10, 25, 50, 100))
    #>   return_period exceedance_prob return_level
    #> 1             2            0.50     23.69954
    #> 2            10            0.10     33.11784
    #> 3            25            0.04     37.27967
    #> 4            50            0.02     40.18123
    #> 5           100            0.01     42.93680

The `precip` dataset provides a realistic real-data example:

    fit_precip <- fitverse(as.numeric(precip),
                           dists   = c("pearson3", "lognormal", "gamma", "gev"),
                           method  = "LMOM",
                           xlab    = "Mean annual precipitation (inches)",
                           plot    = FALSE,
                           verbose = FALSE)
    fit_precip$ranking[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #>   Rank              Distribution      AIC      BIC
    #> 2    1                     Gamma 584.2679 588.7649
    #> 3    2 Generalised Extreme Value       NA       NA
    #> 1    3          Pearson Type III       NA       NA

## 8.3 Log-Pearson Type III: US flood standard

Log-Pearson III works the same way as Pearson III, but in log space: \(\log X\) follows a Pearson III. It is the US standard for flood frequency analysis (England Jr. et al. 2019). To simulate, draw a Pearson III value in log space and then exponentiate:

    set.seed(42)
    # Log-Pearson III(shape=5, scale=0.4, loc=2): exp of a shifted Gamma
    x_lp3 <- exp(rgamma(200, shape = 5, scale = 0.4) + 2)

    fit_lp3 <- fitverse(x_lp3, dists = "lpearson3", method = "LMOM",
                        xlab    = "Annual maximum discharge (m^3/s)",
                        plot    = FALSE,
                        verbose = FALSE)
    coef(fit_lp3)
    #>     shape     scale       loc
    #> 7.1940576 0.3211539 1.6223297

## 8.4 Generalised Logistic Distribution (GLO): UK flood standard

The GLO is the standard distribution for UK flood frequency analysis (Robson and Reed 1999). Its shape parameter \(\kappa\) controls how heavy the tail is. To simulate from it, build a parameter list with `lmomco::vec2par()` and use `lmomco::rlmomco()`:

    set.seed(42)
    # GLO(loc=50, scale=8, shape=0.12) via lmomco
    para_glo <- lmomco::vec2par(c(50, 8, 0.12), type = "glo")
    x_glo    <- lmomco::rlmomco(200, para_glo)

    fit_glo <- fitverse(x_glo, dists = "glo", method = "LMOM",
                        xlab    = "Annual maximum river flow (m^3/s)",
                        plot    = FALSE,
                        verbose = FALSE)
    coef(fit_glo)
    #>        loc      scale      shape
    #> 51.7289971  8.2112868  0.2433182
    return_level(fit_glo, return_periods = c(2, 10, 50, 100, 200))
    #>   return_period exceedance_prob return_level
    #> 1             2           0.500     51.72900
    #> 2            10           0.100     65.70404
    #> 3            50           0.020     72.38486
    #> 4           100           0.010     74.44391
    #> 5           200           0.005     76.16752

Comparing all four extreme-value/hydrological distributions on the Port Pirie sea-level data:

    compare_dists(x_sea, dists  = c("gev", "gumbel", "glo"),
                  method  = "LMOM",
                  verbose = FALSE)
    #>   Rank              Distribution Method N_params LogLik     AIC Delta_AIC
    #> 2    1                    Gumbel   LMOM        2 4.2167 -4.4334    0.0000
    #> 1    2 Generalised Extreme Value   LMOM        3 4.2950 -2.5899    1.8435
    #> 3    3      Generalised Logistic   LMOM        3 3.0800 -0.1601    4.2733
    #>       BIC Delta_BIC   KS_p   AD_p ChiSq_p GoF_group Converged dist_key
    #> 2 -0.0846    0.0000 0.8950 0.9958  0.9704         0      TRUE   gumbel
    #> 1  3.9333    4.0179 0.9487 0.9993  0.9588         0      TRUE      gev
    #> 3  6.3631    6.4477 0.9762 0.9882  0.8659         0      TRUE      glo

# 9 Censored and truncated data

In environmental monitoring, clinical trials, reliability testing, and hydrology, data are often incomplete. Censored data means an observation exists but the exact value is unknown. Truncated data means observations outside a range were never recorded at all. `fitverse_censored()` handles both cases for seven distributions: Normal, Log-Normal, Weibull, Exponential, Gamma, Log-Logistic, and Gumbel.

Observations are flagged by a `status` vector using the `survival` package convention: `1` = completely observed, `0` = right-censored, `2` = left-censored, `3` = interval-censored (requires a companion `x_upper` vector).

## 9.1 Right-censored reliability data

Below we make 100 Weibull(1.8, 50) failure times and apply random censoring between 20 and 80 hours, which leaves about 40-45% of them censored:

    set.seed(2026)
    x_fail  <- rweibull(100, shape = 1.8, scale = 50)
    x_cens  <- runif(100,  min = 20, max = 80)
    x_obs   <- pmin(x_fail, x_cens)
    status  <- as.integer(x_fail <= x_cens)   # 1 = event; 0 = censored

    cat("Observed events:", sum(status), "  Censored:", sum(1 - status), "\n")
    #> Observed events: 51   Censored: 49

    res_cens <- fitverse_censored(
      x_obs, status = status,
      dists     = c("weibull", "lognormal", "gamma", "exponential", "loglogistic"),
      criterion = "AIC",
      draw      = FALSE
    )

    # Rankings
    res_cens$rankings[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "LogLik", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #>   Rank Distribution   LogLik     AIC     BIC
    #> 1    1 Log-Logistic -154.264 312.528 317.739
    #> 2    2      Weibull -249.232 502.463 507.674
    #> 3    3        Gamma -249.356 502.711 507.922
    #> 4    4   Log-Normal -250.545 505.090 510.300
    #> 5    5  Exponential -261.818 525.636 528.242

FitVerse picks Weibull as the best fit, as expected. The estimated parameters should be close to the true values (shape = 1.8, scale = 50):

    res_cens$fits[[1L]]$par   # best-fit parameters
    #>     shape     scale
    #>  6.767037 51.120952

    plot(res_cens, top_n = 3)

Parametric survival curves (top 3 models) with Kaplan-Meier reference for right-censored reliability data.

## 9.2 Left-censored environmental data (below detection limit)

Contaminant concentrations are frequently reported only as “below detection limit” (left-censored):

    set.seed(3)
    true_conc  <- rlnorm(80, meanlog = 1.5, sdlog = 0.7)
    dl         <- 3.0   # detection limit
    x_env      <- pmax(true_conc, dl)
    status_env <- ifelse(true_conc < dl, 2L, 1L)   # 2 = left-censored

    cat("Detected:", sum(status_env == 1), "  Left-censored:", sum(status_env == 2), "\n")
    #> Detected: 56   Left-censored: 24

    res_env <- fitverse_censored(x_env, status_env,
                                  xlab = "Concentration (mg/L)",
                                  draw = FALSE)
    res_env$rankings[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #>   Rank Distribution     AIC     BIC
    #> 1    1 Log-Logistic 200.634 205.398
    #> 2    2       Normal 351.945 356.709
    #> 3    3      Weibull 352.374 357.138
    #> 4    4       Gumbel 354.074 358.838
    #> 5    5        Gamma 354.107 358.871
    #> 6    6   Log-Normal 358.455 363.219
    #> 7    7  Exponential 368.787 371.169

## 9.3 Truncated occupational exposure data

If only people with exposures above a cutoff were enrolled, observations below that cutoff were never collected. This is left-truncation:

    set.seed(4)
    x_all   <- rlnorm(200, meanlog = 2.5, sdlog = 0.5)
    x_trunc <- x_all[x_all > 5]   # only enrolled if exposure > 5 mg/m^3

    cat("Retained after truncation:", length(x_trunc), "\n")
    #> Retained after truncation: 195

    res_trunc <- fitverse_censored(x_trunc, trunc_lower = 5,
                                    xlab = "Exposure (mg/m^3)",
                                    draw = FALSE)
    res_trunc$rankings[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #>   Rank Distribution        AIC        BIC
    #> 1    1 Log-Logistic -18692.481 -18685.935
    #> 2    2        Gamma   1227.926   1234.472
    #> 3    3   Log-Normal   1228.232   1234.778
    #> 4    4       Gumbel   1228.318   1234.864
    #> 5    5      Weibull   1229.322   1235.868
    #> 6    6       Normal   1230.928   1237.474
    #> 7    7  Exponential   1248.641   1251.914

# 10 L-moment ratio diagram

An L-moment ratio diagram (Hosking and Wallis 1997) is a simple graphical tool for picking a distribution family. It plots L-kurtosis (\(\tau_4\)) against L-skewness (\(\tau_3\)) and shows where several families fall. Your data’s sample point (\(\hat\tau_3\), \(\hat\tau_4\)) appears as a red dot. The family with the curve closest to that dot is the best match.

`lmrd()` takes either a raw vector or a fitted `fitverse` object:

    lmrd(fit_sea)

L-moment ratio diagram for the Port Pirie sea-level data. The sample point (red) falls closest to the GEV curve, confirming GEV as the preferred family.

    lmrd(fit_rain)

L-moment ratio diagram for US city precipitation. The sample point falls near the Normal/GNO region, consistent with the near-symmetric shape of the data.

How to read the diagram. Each curve (GLO, GEV, GPA, GNO, PE3) shows how a distribution family changes as its shape parameter varies. The labelled dots (Normal, Logistic, Gumbel, Exponential, Uniform) are special cases with a fixed shape. The red sample point shows where your data falls. The family whose curve is nearest to that point is the best starting candidate.

# 11 Extreme-value threshold selection

In Peaks-Over-Threshold (POT) analysis, you need to pick a threshold \(u\) above which the GPD fits the exceedances \(X - u \mid X > u\) (see Davison and Smith 1990; Coles 2001). `ev_threshold()` gives three standard diagnostic plots: the mean residual life (MRL) plot, and stability plots for the GPD shape and modified scale.

    x_rivers <- as.numeric(rivers)  # built-in R: river lengths in miles

    ev_threshold(x_rivers,
                 xlab         = "River length (miles)",
                 n_thresholds = 35)

Threshold diagnostic plots for North American river lengths. Approximate linearity in the MRL plot and constancy of the shape and modified-scale estimates identify a suitable threshold.

Reading the plots. Pick the lowest threshold where (a) the MRL plot looks roughly linear, and (b) the shape (\(\hat\xi\)) and modified scale (\(\hat\sigma^* = \hat\sigma - \hat\xi u\)) are roughly flat. Then fit the GPD to the data above that threshold with `fitverse(dists = "gpd")`.

Individual panel objects can be retrieved without printing, for customisation or embedding in reports:

    res_thr <- ev_threshold(x_rivers, draw = FALSE)
    res_thr$p_mrl    # ggplot2 object: mean residual life plot
    res_thr$p_shape  # ggplot2 object: GPD shape stability
    res_thr$p_scale  # ggplot2 object: GPD modified scale stability

# 12 Extended distribution catalogue

FitVerse adds 13 new distributions to reach 52 in total. They come from insurance, signal processing, finance, hydrology, and robust statistics. The table below lists them:

Key | Distribution | Support | Methods
--- | --- | --- | ---
`gb2` | Generalised Beta 2 | positive | MLE
`kappa4` | Kappa-4 (Hosking) | real | MLE, LMOM
`lindley` | Lindley | positive | MLE, MOM
`gnorm` | Generalised Normal | real | MLE
`dagum` | Dagum (Burr III) | positive | MLE
`johnsonsu` | Johnson SU | real | MLE
`alaplace` | Asymmetric Laplace | real | MLE
`expexp` | Exponentiated Exponential | positive | MLE, MOM
`nig` | Normal-Inverse Gaussian | real | MLE
`wakeby` | Wakeby | real | LMOM
`ghyp` | Generalised Hyperbolic | real | MLE
`truncnorm` | Truncated Normal | bounded | MLE
`nakagami` | Nakagami | positive | MLE, MOM

All 13 are available through the standard `fitverse()` call using their key string.

## 12.1 Lindley distribution

The Lindley distribution (Lindley 1958) has one parameter \(\theta\) and is defined on \((0, \infty)\). It comes up in Bayesian inference and queueing theory. Because it only has one parameter, it is simple to work with.

    set.seed(42)
    x_lindley <- c(rexp(150, 0.4), rgamma(150, 2, 0.4))  # Lindley mixture

    fit_lindley <- fitverse(x_lindley,
                            dists   = c("lindley", "exponential", "gamma"),
                            method  = c("MLE", "MOM"),
                            xlab    = "Lifetime (hours)",
                            plot    = FALSE,
                            verbose = FALSE)
    fit_lindley$ranking[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "Method", "AIC", "Delta_AIC")]
    #>   Rank Distribution Method      AIC Delta_AIC
    #> 3    1        Gamma    MLE 1384.810    0.0000
    #> 2    2  Exponential    MLE 1389.559    4.7494
    #> 1    3      Lindley    MLE 1394.062    9.2525

## 12.2 Johnson SU distribution

Johnson SU is a four-parameter distribution on all of \(\mathbb{R}\) (Johnson 1949). It can take on a wide range of skewness and kurtosis values, including ones that Normal distributions cannot match. It is often used in financial risk modelling.

    set.seed(42)
    # True JohnsonSU(gamma=-0.5, delta=1.2, xi=50, lambda=20) data
    z <- rnorm(300)
    x_jsu <- 50 + 20 * sinh((z - (-0.5)) / 1.2)

    fit_jsu <- fitverse(x_jsu,
                        dists   = c("johnsonsu", "normal", "skewnormal", "student_t"),
                        method  = "MLE",
                        xlab    = "Simulated returns",
                        plot    = FALSE,
                        verbose = FALSE)
    fit_jsu$ranking[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #>   Rank               Distribution      AIC      BIC
    #> 1    1                 Johnson SU 2733.034 2747.849
    #> 4    2 Student-t (Location-Scale) 2741.988 2753.099
    #> 3    3                Skew-Normal 2778.540 2789.651
    #> 2    4                     Normal 2797.925 2805.333

## 12.3 Nakagami distribution

The Nakagami-\(m\) distribution was developed for radio signal modelling but also appears in reliability and medical imaging (Nakagami 1960). The two parameters are \(m \geq 0.5\) (shape) and \(\Omega > 0\) (spread). Both can be estimated by MLE and MOM.

    set.seed(42)
    # Nakagami(m=2, Omega=100)
    x_naka <- sqrt(rgamma(300, shape = 2, rate = 2 / 100))

    fit_naka <- fitverse(x_naka,
                         dists   = c("nakagami", "rayleigh", "weibull", "gamma"),
                         method  = c("MLE", "MOM"),
                         xlab    = "Signal amplitude",
                         plot    = FALSE,
                         verbose = FALSE)
    fit_naka$ranking[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "Method", "AIC")]
    #>   Rank          Distribution Method      AIC
    #> 1    1              Nakagami    MLE 1578.621
    #> 3    2 Weibull (2-Parameter)    MLE 1579.715
    #> 4    3                 Gamma    MLE 1585.402
    #> 2    4              Rayleigh    MLE 1639.478
    coef(fit_naka)   # should recover m≈2, Omega≈100
    #>         m     Omega
    #>  1.923073 95.829249

## 12.4 Wakeby distribution (L-Moments only)

The Wakeby distribution has five parameters and is defined by its quantile function rather than a density (Houghton 1978). Because there is no closed-form density, L-Moments is the only practical estimation method. Wakeby is very flexible and can match a wide range of shapes, so it is useful when standard families do not fit well.

    set.seed(42)
    para_wak <- lmomco::vec2par(c(10, 50, 0.8, 5, 0.2), type = "wak")
    x_wak    <- lmomco::rlmomco(300, para_wak)

    fit_wak <- fitverse(x_wak,
                        dists   = c("wakeby", "gev", "glo", "lognormal"),
                        method  = c("MLE", "LMOM"),
                        xlab    = "Simulated flood peak",
                        plot    = FALSE,
                        verbose = FALSE)
    fit_wak$ranking[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "Method", "AIC")]
    #>   Rank              Distribution Method      AIC
    #> 4    1                    Wakeby   LMOM 2667.576
    #> 3    2                Log-Normal    MLE 2712.534
    #> 1    3 Generalised Extreme Value    MLE 2718.151
    #> 2    4      Generalised Logistic    MLE 2743.582

# 13 Grouped and interval data

Sometimes you only have summary tables rather than individual data points. This happens in published reports, historical flood databases, and environmental monitoring. `fitverse_grouped()` fits distributions to binned data by maximising the grouped log-likelihood \(\sum_i n_i \log[F(u_i) - F(l_i)]\), where \(n_i\) is the count in bin \(i\) and \(l_i\), \(u_i\) are the bin boundaries.

There are two ways to provide the data:

- Midpoint format: give the midpoints and counts; FitVerse works out the boundaries.
- Interval format: give explicit lower and upper boundaries alongside counts.

## 13.1 Midpoint format: annual rainfall

    # Annual rainfall (mm) grouped into 10 mm classes
    rain_mids   <- c(55, 65, 75, 85, 95, 105, 115, 125, 135)
    rain_counts <- c(  4, 12, 28, 35, 41,  30,  18,   8,   4)

    fit_grp <- fitverse_grouped(
      midpoints = rain_mids,
      counts    = rain_counts,
      dists     = c("normal", "gamma", "lognormal", "weibull"),
      xlab      = "Annual rainfall (mm)"
    )

    fit_grp$rankings[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "Method", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #> NULL

    coef(fit_grp)   # best-fit parameters
    #>      shape       rate
    #> 28.5580978  0.3072591

## 13.2 Interval format: failure-time data

    # Failure times recorded in irregular inspection intervals
    fail_lower  <- c(  0, 200, 400, 700, 1000, 1500, 2000)
    fail_upper  <- c(200, 400, 700,1000, 1500, 2000, 3000)
    fail_counts <- c(  8,  22,  35,  28,   19,   11,    7)

    fit_fail <- fitverse_grouped(
      lower  = fail_lower,
      upper  = fail_upper,
      counts = fail_counts,
      dists  = c("weibull", "lognormal", "gamma", "exponential"),
      xlab   = "Failure time (hours)"
    )

    fit_fail$rankings[, c("Rank", "Distribution", "AIC", "BIC")]
    #> NULL

# 14 Automated report generation

`generate_report()` saves a self-contained HTML or PDF file for any `fitverse` result. It includes the data summary, the ranked model table, parameter estimates, goodness-of-fit stats, and diagnostic plots for the top models. Everything goes in one file that you can share with others.

    set.seed(42)
    x_rep <- rgamma(300, shape = 3, rate = 0.1)

    fit_rep <- fitverse(x_rep,
                        method  = c("MLE", "MOM", "LMOM"),
                        xlab    = "Loss amount ($000)",
                        verbose = FALSE)

    # Export HTML report (opens in browser by default; set open = FALSE to suppress)
    generate_report(fit_rep,
                    output_file = file.path(tempdir(), "fitverse_report.html"),
                    title       = "Loss Distribution Analysis",
                    author      = "Karuna G. Reddy",
                    top_n       = 5L,
                    open        = FALSE)

You can include bootstrap confidence intervals in the same report by passing `bootstrap_ci()` output through the `boot` argument:

    boot_rep <- bootstrap_ci(fit_rep, B = 499, seed = 1, verbose = FALSE)
    generate_report(fit_rep,
                    boot        = boot_rep,
                    output_file = file.path(tempdir(), "fitverse_report_ci.html"),
                    open        = FALSE)

PDF output is also supported (requires `rmarkdown` and `knitr`):

    generate_report(fit_rep, output_file = file.path(tempdir(), "fitverse_report.pdf"), open = FALSE)

# 15 Interactive Shiny application

FitVerse comes with a Shiny web application that lets you use all package features without writing R code. It is useful for day-to-day work, teaching, and showing results to others.

## 15.1 Launching the app

    fitverse_app()

This opens the app in your browser. You can also use it online at https://fitverse.shinyapps.io/FitVerse/ without installing anything.

## 15.2 Application tabs

The app has nine tabs:

Data & Fit is the main tab. Upload a CSV or paste your data in, pick distributions and methods, and click Fit Distributions. The ranking table appears straight away, sorted by AIC/BIC with the composite GoF score as a tiebreaker. Click any row to inspect that distribution in detail.

Overview shows summary statistics for the data alongside a side-by-side histogram and empirical CDF of the observed values.

Plot overlays the top fitted distributions on the data using six diagnostic views selectable via radio buttons: PDF/histogram overlay, CDF, P-P plot, Q-Q plot, survival function, and hazard rate.

GoF Tests presents the four formal goodness-of-fit test results (KS, AD, CvM, Chi-Squared) for the selected distribution in a colour-coded table, with stars indicating significance levels.

Parameters displays the estimated parameter values for every fitted model, together with the log-likelihood, AIC, BIC, and convergence status.

Bootstrap CI runs non-parametric bootstrap resampling on the selected fit and reports confidence intervals for each parameter and, for extreme-value distributions, for user-specified T-year return levels.

Grouped Data provides the `fitverse_grouped()` interface for binned/tabular input. Enter class midpoints or interval boundaries with their counts, select distributions, and fit directly to the grouped data.

Explore Distributions (StatAssist) is a learning tool. Pick any of the 52 distributions from a list, move the parameter sliders, and watch the PDF, CDF, and summary statistics change. There is also a tail-probability calculator and a random sample generator.

Report generates a self-contained HTML report for the current fit with a single button click, equivalent to calling `generate_report()` from R.

# 16 Sample datasets

FitVerse ships several ready-to-use CSV files in `inst/extdata/`. You can load any of them with `system.file()`.

Four files contain individual observations for use with `fitverse()`:

File | Variable | n | Good starting distributions
--- | --- | --- | ---
`annual_max_flows.csv` | Peak flow (m³/s), Rewa River, Fiji | 75 | GEV, Gumbel, LP3, Log-Normal
`wind_speeds.csv` | Daily max gust (m/s), Nadi Airport | 200 | Weibull, Rayleigh, Gamma
`failure_times.csv` | Capacitor failure time (h) | 150 | Weibull, Gamma, Birnbaum-Saunders
`insurance_claims.csv` | Property claim amount ($000) | 180 | Log-Normal, Gamma, Pareto

Three files contain grouped / interval data for use with `fitverse_grouped()`:

File | Format | Description
--- | --- | ---
`rainfall_grouped.csv` | midpoint, count | Annual max rainfall, Suva, Fiji (80 yr)
`failure_times_grouped.csv` | lower, upper, count | Life test: 120 components
`insurance_losses_grouped.csv` | lower, upper, count | 250 property claims

    # Read an individual-observation dataset and fit distributions
    path <- system.file("extdata", "annual_max_flows.csv", package = "FitVerse")
    flows <- read.csv(path, comment.char = "#")$peak_flow_m3s

    fit_flows <- fitverse(flows,
                          method  = c("MLE", "LMOM"),
                          xlab    = "Peak flow (m3/s)",
                          verbose = FALSE)
    print(fit_flows)

    # Read a grouped dataset and fit
    gpath <- system.file("extdata", "rainfall_grouped.csv", package = "FitVerse")
    dat   <- read_grouped_csv(gpath)

    fit_rain <- fitverse_grouped(midpoints = dat$midpoints,
                                 counts    = dat$counts,
                                 xlab      = "Rainfall (mm)")
    print(fit_rain)

# 17 Conclusion

FitVerse brings MLE, MOM, and L-moment fitting for 52 distributions into one R package. It handles model ranking, goodness-of-fit testing, and plotting, and adds tools for bootstrap CIs, T-year return levels, batch fitting, grouped data, L-moment ratio diagrams, threshold selection, censored data, and automated reports. Everything works from R or from the Shiny app at https://fitverse.shinyapps.io/FitVerse/.

The four hydrological distributions (GPD, Pearson III, Log-Pearson III, and GLO) align FitVerse with the US Bulletin 17C (England Jr. et al. 2019), UK WINFAP (Robson and Reed 1999), and POT standards used in water-resources work.

The simulation results back up the multi-method approach. LMOM beats MLE for heavy-tailed distributions at small sample sizes. MLE does better at large samples. Rather than picking one method upfront, running all three and letting AIC choose gives a good result in both cases.

FitVerse also connects to the OptiStrata ecosystem, feeding fitted distributions into `stratifyR` (Reddy and Khan 2020) for stratification of continuous survey populations.

# References

Asquith, William H. 2024. Lmomco: L-Moments, Censored L-Moments, Trimmed L-Moments, L-Comoments, and Many Distributions. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmomco.
Coles, Stuart. 2001. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0.
Davison, Anthony C., and Richard L. Smith. 1990. “Models for Exceedances over High Thresholds.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 52 (3): 393–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01796.x.
Delignette-Muller, Marie Laure, and Christophe Dutang. 2015. “Fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions.” Journal of Statistical Software 64 (4): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v064.i04.
Dutang, Christophe, Vincent Goulet, and Mathieu Pigeon. 2008. “Actuar: An R Package for Actuarial Science.” Journal of Statistical Software 25 (7): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i07.
England Jr., John F., Timothy A. Cohn, Beth A. Faber, et al. 2019. Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency—Bulletin 17C. Techniques and Methods Nos. 4-B5. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4B5.
Hosking, Jonathan R. M. 1990. “L-Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 52 (1): 105–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01775.x.
Hosking, Jonathan R. M., and James R. Wallis. 1997. Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L-Moments. Cambridge University Press.
Houghton, John C. 1978. “Birth of a Parent: The Wakeby Distribution for Modeling Flood Flows.” Water Resources Research 14 (6): 1105–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i006p01105.
Johnson, Norman Lloyd. 1949. “Systems of Frequency Curves Generated by Methods of Translation.” Biometrika 36 (1/2): 149–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332539.
Lindley, Dennis V. 1958. “Fiducial Distributions and Bayes’ Theorem.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 20 (1): 102–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00278.x.
Nakagami, Minoru. 1960. “The m-Distribution: A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading.” In Statistical Methods in Radio Wave Propagation, edited by William C. Hoffman. Pergamon Press.
Pearson, Karl. 1894. “Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 185: 71–110. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1894.0003.
Pickands, James. 1975. “Statistical Inference Using Extreme Order Statistics.” The Annals of Statistics 3 (1): 119–31. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176343003.
Reddy, Karuna G., and Mohammad G. M. Khan. 2020. “stratifyR: An R Package for Optimal Stratification and Sample Allocation for Univariate Populations.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 62 (3): 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12301.
Robson, Alice, and Duncan Reed. 1999. Flood Estimation Handbook, Volume 3: Statistical Procedures for Flood Frequency Estimation. Institute of Hydrology.
Venables, William N., and Brian D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2.