=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Cute idea, execution is a bit "plastic".  Seems almost an afterthought when
compared to your cathedral scene.

=====
From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca:
Migawd, how do you do it Nathan?  TWO images in one competition that I think are worth 20-20-20...lovely image.
=====
From tholal@bga.com:
The grass and flowers look a little stiff but the ants and marbles are very well done


=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
Nathan, where do you find the time to create so many marvelously detailed 
images!?



=====
From 93semeno@scar.utoronto.ca:
This one is much better than the cathedral. It's more interesting.

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Good job. Humor is so needed in this competition. Thanks. I was about to die from boredom looking at all of the bottles and glasses.


=====
From usmitc04@mcl.ucsb.edu:
KILL THE ANTS!!!!!!!


=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Flowers and grass seem too stiff, artificial and regular.

=====
From uvasst00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Great concept, I love the great sense of motion in the flying marble and in the ants.

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Very lively and original. One tiny nitpick: the ants and dirt texture in the foreground
are very good; but the perfectly straight and vertical grass + flowers in the bg. is kinda distracting. The depth blur helps, but randomly oriented curved blades would've been better.
(lathe objects maybe? torus segments?)

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
nice concept.


From web_user@tonyv.aztec.co.za:
Hopefully not too many ants were injured during the modelling.
Notable for originality