=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Very nice!  I like "infinite progression" images, they're difficult to make well
but very nice when done right.

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
I'm assuming that the person in this scene was borrowed from a plug-in?


=====
From kazemir@pde.com:
I like.  Art imitates life!

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
I love recursive art recursive art recursive art.  Neat idea, the person needs
some work though (some unatural features: (how do I put this delicately?) her
butt is to round, and the crack goe way too high (I'm blushing); Also her arm
is too angular.  Still, humans are hard, I doubt I could have done much better.
Nice job.

=====
From jgoeson@msn.com:
WOW!  Wow! wow! ...!

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Hmmm... nice idea, with the pseudo-infinite encapsulation. I dislike some
colors, but loved the idea.

=====
From 93johnst@scar.utoronto.ca:
I really like the effect created by re-rendering the image until you can't notice
the picture in the frame. Very nice.

=====
From lowellr@globaldialog.com:
Nice idea

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Marvelous.  The recursive theme is intriguing and very well done.
I like this image a lot.  Excellent muted colors.
The picture frames and lights are nicely detailed and accurate.
Another scene that captures "arts", but what about "entertainment"?

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
I think lighting this kind of scene is not really obvious (a kind of Larsen effect should appear ?).
I like it, but I would just like to say that both frames are identical, which is quite unlikely in a real museum.

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
You list 2 names, yet say "my" instead of "our".
Nice concept.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
The overall/ambient light is too high, drawing attention away from the image's
main focus. The second largest painting is still to near, too large and too well
lit (IMO).

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Very good (maybe except for the texture of the
woman's shirt).

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
Great image. :{)
Two comments:
1) Would have liked to have seen some text (even if it's illegible) on the plaques
at the base of each picture's frame.
2) More work done on the textures on the female figure. I know, it's difficult
to accurately create skin and hair textures. And I know it's something none of us 
have solved yet. Still, it bears mentioning. <grin>

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Great idea. "I Am Art" for the title?  Tied for my highest score for concept.


=====
From r@dialup83.webbernet.net>:
In my top ten.
Notable for composition