=====
From spanky@wpi.edu:
I like how the plants seem to be lit from the inside

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Water striders disturb the water's surface (depress it).
=====
From d97ta@efd.lth.se:
like the eerie glow...
the ripples are too tiny.


=====
From stubbs@dundee.net:
nice crustacia, but the image is too symmetical

=====
From marc_w@ncx.com:

hmmm the spring dance at the pond on LSD. I LIKE IT!
=====
From simon.davis@altavista.net:
Very flat for 3D Studio Max
=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
I can't tell from your description what is original work and
what is prefab models here.

The clouds should obscure the moon.

With some work, this could be a quite good scene -- the
novelty of the subject lends it a lot of interest.

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
symmetrical to a fault, pretty though

=====
From fisher2@pobox.upenn.edu:
Too many of the same object used cut down on the tech score for me.  I
really liked the surreal lit from beneath effect in this scene.  Too much
gray.  Addition of more colors complimenting the colors already in the
scene would be nice.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Unusual image.  Everything is very luminescent, glowing.


=====
From r@199.45.245.103:
Very intriguing. I really like it. I do think it is a bit too visually noisy- if the water were at maybe 30% of its current reflectiveness, I think that would be solved.
Notable for originality