=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
The fog effect is really cool. The grass could use some work--it looks like
water in its own right.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
I don't understand why water on right is different-looking.
I like the tree on the right better. Bricks are too simple.
=====
From amason@cs.uct.ac.za:
image is nice but a bit featureless. more detailed textures would help.

=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
The water looks good. Fog was a nice touch.  
=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
The fog is used very nicely, but the overall scene is quite boring.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Ground needed more plygons, you can see the flat planes. Maybe HF types cold have been used to give more ground detail.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
That's UK, no doubt. Only there POV fog is so realist. ;)
Nice atmosphere. I find the foam too bright (or it is a strange industrial
residue?:() Finally, my understading on the sky thing, it's very diffcult.

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
Nice and desolate.  I found flat overcast and fog similarly useful as I a=
m a true beginner and was inspired to enter with a week to go in the roun=
d.  The trout ladder is a nice touch.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Great sense of solitude on a cool morning.
The bubbling water seems almost too bright white, and transitions a bit too abruptly into the still water, but a good effort nonetheless.
The lock mechanism could use a little more structure.  How does it work?
The sign is gratuitous and detracts from the scene because it upsets the scale: is it a huge sign, or is the lock too small for boats?  Not a bad image overall.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
It looks as though the fog has obscured some of the texture details.

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
A bit too simple, good use of fog.


=====
From r@slater.ed.edu.jonkoping.se:
Hmmm. the gras looks very flat, but i like the water.