=====
From jknepley@chisp.net:
This is a good model of a glass, but it needs to live somewhere.

=====
From agage@csee.usf.edu:
Simple, but the water texture is good; I figured someone would use this idea.

=====
From witoslaw@kki.net.pl:
I have seen this pic before. I think I even have it on my CD.
=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Nice glass. The water droplets? look kind of like glass beads; perhaps they could
be made less perfect. (Assuming that they really are meant to be water droplets.)
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
I like the glass, and the water, but I've never seen a gold spoon before.  perhaps
a normal steel spoon would have left attention on the glass and water more.

=====
From jasondinger@hotmail.com:
 the texture of the spoon is odd, and that's a good thing. i really like the droplets
of water. 


=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Very cool.  Simplicity greatly adds to this image!
=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
The refraction and transparency of the water and the glass itself looks like
"the real thing", but I find the texture of the spoon and the table rather
disturbing. For that simple a scene: really well done.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Ok entry, but not _everything_ has to have some sort of bozo pigment...is the spoon made of alabaster or something?

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
Very realistic scene, except that the spoon's bowl seems very thick.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good view of refraction.  The water is quite dark, though.