Internet-Draft | Nested JWT | June 2022 |
Shekh-Yusef | Expires 16 December 2022 | [Page] |
This specification defines a mechanism for including multiple subjects in a JWT. A primary subject in an enclosing JWT with its own claims, and a related secondary subject in a nested JWT with its own claims.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 16 December 2022.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.¶
JSON Web Token (JWT) [RFC7519] is a mechanism that is used to transfer claims between two parties across security domains. Nested JWT is a JWT in which the payload is another JWT. The current specification does not define a means by which the enclosing JWT could have its own Claims Set, only the enclosed JWT would have claims.¶
There are a number of use cases where there is a need to represent multiple related subjects in one JWT; a primary subject and a related secondary subject.¶
This specification defines a mechanism for including multiple subjects in a JWT. A primary subject in an enclosing JWT with its own claims, and a related secondary subject in a nested JWT with its own claims.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC8174].¶
The following are few use cases that might benefit from such a concept, that fall into two different categories:¶
In the following cases, both JWTs are issued by the same issuer.¶
Two or more primary related subjects e.g. a married couple. The authorization server is setup to provide one of the subjects with permissions to access the other related subject resources.¶
One user (e.g., wife) logs in to a application (e.g., pharmacy application), gets redirected to the authorization server, authenticates, and asks for permission to access resources (e.g., medication) for the other primary subject (e.g., husband). The authorization server then issues a JWT with the primary subject in the enclosing JWT and the other primary subject in the nested JWT.¶
In the following cases, the JWTs are issued by different issuers.¶
[RFC8225] defines a PASSporT, which is a JWT, that is used to verify the identity of a caller in an incoming call.¶
The PASSporT Extension for Diverted Calls draft [STIR] uses a nested PASSporT to deliver the details of an incoming call that get redirected. An authentication service acting for a retargeting entity generates new PASSporT and embeds the original PASSporT inside the new one. When the new target receives the nested PASSporT it will be able to validate the enclosing PASSporT and use the details of the enclosed PASSporT to identify the original target.¶
In this case, the original JWT is issued by the calling service, and the new enclosing JWT is issued by the retargeting service.¶
Network Service Mesh [NSM] is a mechanism that maps the concept of a service mesh in Kubernetes to L2/L3 payloads.¶
NSM GRPS messages may pass through multiple intermediaries, each of which may transform the message. Each intermediary is expected to create its own JWT token, and include a claim that contains the JWT it received with the message it has transformed.¶
In this case, the original JWT is issued by the entity sending the initial message, and the new enclosing JWT is issued by the intermediate entity.¶
To allow the AS to differentiate between an authorization request for a single subject and an authorization request for multiple subjects, this document defines the following parameter:¶
A hint to the AS that the request is for a multi-subject token, which can take one of two values:¶
If the access_token query parameter is included in the request, then the AS SHOULD embed the provided token in the issued token, if the issuer-hint has the "External" value.¶
The payload of the enclosing JWT is JSON object that contains the Claims Set of the primary subject, and one new claim that is used to hold the enclosed JWT and its relation to the primary subject.¶
This document defines a new claim, "rsub" (Related Subject) Claim, that is used to contain the enclosed JWT and its relation to the primary subject. The "rsub" contains two claims:¶
The following relathionship types are defined by this specification:¶
The following example is for a multi-subject token that represents a child/parent relashionship. The enclosing JWT represents the primary user, the child in this case, and the enclosed token in the "rsub" claim represents the secondary user, the parent in this case.¶
{ "alg": "HS256", "typ": "JWT", } { "sub": "1234567890", "name": "John Doe", "iat": 1516239022, "rsub": { “rel” : "urn:ietf:params:oauth:subject-type:authority" “jwt” : { "sub": "9876543210", "name": "Alice Doe", "iat": 1516239022, } } }¶
In this use case, both JWTs are issued by the same entity handling the authorization request.¶
The existing security considerations apply to the use cases where the JWTs are issued by the same entity. Allowing more than one subject to access the same account might open the door for potential abuse. Care must be taken to ensure that when a secondary subject is added to an account that an adequate approval process is in place.¶
In the multiple issuers use cases, the entity handling the incoming authorization request that contains a JWT MUST validate the token and ensure that it is coming from a trusted entity, before attempting to embed that JWT into a new multi-subject JWT issued by the AS.¶
TODO¶
TODO¶